TomStickler. That is a great looking bike and I would love to read about his experiences.
Viking. Reading your response to my previous post, sounded like a counterpoint at first but really isn't at all. In fact, we're agreeing to the same thing from different sides. You even made my point, suggesting that re-purposing the exampled VFR platform (for the ST customer) would be easier than re-purposing the ST engine to create the new CTX. I called it a business-suit decision to go that direction; nothing controversial there. I may have sounded a little critical but maybe, as an ST owner, I'm just feeling a little left out of "mother Honda's" consideration is all; create and design a new bike for an unknown CTX customer instead of improving and modernizing an existing model for the proven segment of ST customers.
One remaining question. Did the Honda suits decide additionally that the CTX is not to be the replacement but the alternative choice for its ST1300 customer base?
Of course, many ST lovers and loyalists will readily dismiss such a far-fetched notion but Honda's acts are speaking louder than their words and well, their are no words to the contrary.
One historical reference that supports my theory... Back in the day, the "Goldwing segment" (I'll call it) was filled with competitors but we all know how that turned out--one by one, they all fell away or simply stopped making competitive models to the Goldwing.
Maybe, just maybe, Honda has decided to stop competing in the "ST segment" (I'll call it), yielding the reigns to Yamaha, BMW, Triumph, Kawasaki. The powers-that-be at Honda are merely doing what they have decided is important to them--not what we, the people think is important to us. Heck, the Gov't does it all of the time.