Fork spring replacement without removing the forks??

OP
OP
CruSTy

CruSTy

My Perception is my reality.
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 30, 2013
Messages
522
Age
71
Location
Paola, Kansas
Bike
2007 ST1300A
2024 Miles
001391
STOC #
#9021
Not sure what your weight is, but I found the 1.2 to be a little to stiff. I weigh 170. I started with the 1.2 and ended up with .90. Thus my earlier post about changing out fork springs many times.
6'3 225# without gear and 80% 2 up riding. I think I could use some more damping but this is definitely a + improvement.
 

dduelin

Tune my heart to sing Thy grace
Site Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
9,681
Location
Jacksonville
Bike
GL1800 R1200RT NC700
2024 Miles
008131
STOC #
6651

ST Gui

240Robert
Site Supporter
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
9,281
Location
SF-Oakland CA
Bike
ST1300, 2010
What 7wt oil?
Post #17.


SAE weight is a poor way to compare fork oil performance.
I don't really care. It's a starting point and all that's important is that it's good enough for me. If somebody tries a given oil and it seems to work for them then followup questions can narrow it down. For 99% of us it will still boil down to trial and error.

But if I'm having trouble sleeping I'll check out that site again.
 
OP
OP
CruSTy

CruSTy

My Perception is my reality.
Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 30, 2013
Messages
522
Age
71
Location
Paola, Kansas
Bike
2007 ST1300A
2024 Miles
001391
STOC #
#9021
SAE weight is a poor way to compare fork oil performance. http://www.peterverdone.com/archive/lowspeed.htm
As a walk in consumer I just went to the local MC retailer and bought Bel-Ray 5,7,10 wt oils in the event I had to blend them. The link you sent is a great sources of information. Guess I got lucky not by cheaping out on the oil. Looks like Bel Ray is one of the more consistent ones. Doesn't surprise me that manufactures actuals vary so much from the SAE ratings. I wonder who did the actual testing for this chart.
 
Top Bottom