nokesy
2007 ST1300A
I have a 2007 with 240,000 on it and not thinking of doing any move soon.
Why? ... How can you beat "(and loving it)" !I'm still riding an 1100 (and loving it) - I may consider moving TO the ST1300!
Clutch
Great read, thanks for sharing!!I had this written for my club magazine in May 2014 - wondering what my next bike would be. My previous bike was an St1300A6, had 70,000miles on the clock and was 7 years old. Prior to that I had owned two different ST1100s
No effort in reproducing this. Since writing, I have discovered that indeed the engine is tuned or mapped differently on the newer models than it was on the A6 that I had previously. Much better.
---------------------------
This has been a long time in planning. There is no way that I could afford to buy a brand new motorcycle having stopped working 3 years ago if we hadn?t planned for it, but I don?t think that we expected to do it so soon. Our old Pan had 70,000 miles on the clock, we had had it for 7 years and it was just beginning to cost us money to keep it running. Doing the servicing myself, I knew all of the things that were going to need attention and how the cost would eat into the fund that we had set aside for a new bike. There was nothing wrong with the current bike and would easily last us a few more years, but in the meantime, the price of new bikes would go up, and the amount available to spend would diminish. The time was right.
But which bike ? We have owned 3 Pans up to now - a 1996 ST1100, a 2000 ST1100ABS and a 2006 ST1300A, and we have covered a total of about 170,000 miles on them. I?ve loved every one of them, and they suit us, but there isn?t a hint that a new model form Honda will be replacing it any time soon.
Then RIDE magazine produced an excellent comparison of the 6 top tourers available in their October 2013 edition. I read it carefully and then over the next couple of weeks I read it over and over again. Some of the stuff they say about the Pan seem to be unnecessarily negative and offhand and the comments are not consistent with my experience, and I dismiss them. Some of the stuff said about the other bikes may be of the same subjective standard, so I am wary of believing everything that I read. Nevertheless it is an interesting comparison which helps me to make up my mind.
I go and look at a few bikes, get some facts and figures, go and sit on them in showrooms. I?m not interested in a test ride at the moment, I?m more interested in the luggage capacity, the leg room, where the handlebars and footrests fall. That sort of thing.
So one of the most likely contenders for a new bike, the FJR, falls at the first hurdle. It seems Yamaha have built a tourer on which you must not use panniers and top box at the same time. I don?t care how good it feels, or how capable a bike it is, if it cannot carry our luggage, it is of no use to me.
Of course, I have my prejudices and some bigoted opinions about certain things. For example, I cannot believe in the reliability of those single sided swinging arms that are used on some tourers. They make it very easy to remove the rear wheel, but I cannot see how this offsets the extra load that I reckon must be exerted on the rear bearings, compared to having a conventional swing arm and axle. Knowledge of two people who have had these bearings fail on them simply reinforces my prejudices. So that removes another two bikes from my list of candidates.
I also don?t like the idea of fly-by-wire on a motorbike. I think of the recorded phone conversation with that poor family in the Toyota Lexus, desperately trying to get their car to stop. There were reports at the time that a software error prevented the brakes from being operated if the accelerator was still pressed - why would you want to brake if your foot was on the accelerator - is the logic that I assume was in the programmer?s mind. I have no way of knowing if that is true, but Toyota did recall cars for a sticking accelerator pedal. I?m sorry, but if I?m negotiating a particularly tricky hairpin, balancing the lean of the bike with the throttle, I don?t want anybody?s software deciding whether or not it is going to apply or reduce the power, and by how much. The comments from test rides about the jerky nature of some of the bikes with fly by wire throttles only serve to reinforce my prejudices.
So basically, that was it. All of the contenders had been crossed off my list. Only the Pan remained. Yes, it has its little foibles, its basically the same bike of 12 years ago but that doesn?t make it a bad bike. On the contrary, in fact.
I wonder about the decision I am about to make. What if Honda bring out a new Pan European in 2014/2015? How would I feel having committed my money for my last ever bike to one which hasn?t changed since 2009 ? I went through the list of possible modifications for any new contender, thinking of the recent VFR, the variable valve timing, the dual clutch and the electronic bells and whistles on other bikes. If a new bike came out, would I want to buy it ? Would I still be able to do my own servicing ?
I decided not. So I bought myself my 4th Honda Pan European - a brand new 2013-built ST1300. In my book, there?s still nothing that comes close. It has some modifications from my previous ST1300A6. The speed sensor disc is different, as are the front brake calipers and front brake lever; the SMC on the front left caliper has been modified. The side panels have fill-ins, and the hydraulic fluid reservoirs have plastic floats. It feels different - more positive, more planted on the road. The engine doesn?t ?pink? like my ST1300A6 did from new when hot and under load, and the brakes seem to have more bite.
Its nice to see in the ?Rider Power? survey that the 12 year old ST1300 and the 25 year old ST1100 came 3rd and 4th in the Touring bike section respectively, and both of them feature in the top 10 bikes overall.
(Written April - May 2014))
Huh?? Most would say it just got broke in. First valve check is around then, right? :Our old Pan had 70,000 miles on the clock, we had had it for 7 years and it was just beginning to cost us money to keep it running.
Yea, this is my issue, time spent in maintenance on an older bike. My St is almost 9 years. Right now maintenance costs are low compared to a new bike, even with SMC and quartet harness replacements. It's the down time, my time, and not riding time that gets to me. I just don't enjoy maintenance. At first I was relying on the shop, but they literally broke things. I really enjoyed her when she was young though.I was spending more and more time in the garage dealing with odd jobs, and looking at what needed doing next. Bearings, disk rotors, smc, fork seals, rear suspension, steering bearings, clutch further down the line
That's one of the reasons I have three ST1100s in my garage - if one is ill, I don't have to be in a hurry to tinker with it. I just wait until the weather's unpleasant and then take a look at it. I've got close to 20,000 miles on ST1300 rentals and over 300,000 miles on ST1100s. I have no plan to move 'up' as my ST1100s do everything I need them to do and are way more capable motorcycle than I am capable rider. ;-) One of these days I will get around to finishing my ST1100 adjustable windshield project ...Yea, this is my issue, time spent in maintenance on an older bike. My St is almost 9 years. Right now maintenance costs are low compared to a new bike, even with SMC and quartet harness replacements. It's the down time, my time, and not riding time that gets to me. I just don't enjoy maintenance. At first I was relying on the shop, but they literally broke things. I really enjoyed her when she was young though.
I'll say this though, you can get fantastic support from this forum.
Having multiple bikes has it's ups and downs. The good thing, you should always have a bike to ride, the not so good thing, you always have a bike to work on! 4:That's one of the reasons I have three ST1100s in my garage - if one is ill, I don't have to be in a hurry to tinker with it. I just wait until the weather's unpleasant and then take a look at it. I've got close to 20,000 miles on ST1300 rentals and over 300,000 miles on ST1100s. I have no plan to move 'up' as my ST1100s do everything I need them to do and are way more capable motorcycle than I am capable rider. ;-) One of these days I will get around to finishing my ST1100 adjustable windshield project ...
So far, my ST1100s just keep on trucking - usually just oil and 'tars'. I did have to correct a few things on one of them after I got it back from a 100,000 mile service at a dealer. At 100,000 miles I get the timing belt changed, valves checked, all fluids changed (brakes, forks, rear, etc.), all hoses changed, spark plugs replaced and the carbs synced. If I spend more time riding them rather that tinkering with them, they seem to do a lot better for me. ;-) And riding them regularly does them (and me) a lot of good.Having multiple bikes has it's ups and downs. The good thing, you should always have a bike to ride, the not so good thing, you always have a bike to work on! 4:
Very true!So far, my ST1100s just keep on trucking - usually just oil and 'tars'. I did have to correct a few things on one of them after I got it back from a 100,000 mile service at a dealer. At 100,000 miles I get the timing belt changed, valves checked, all fluids changed (brakes, forks, rear, etc.), all hoses changed, spark plugs replaced and the carbs synced. If I spend more time riding them rather that tinkering with them, they seem to do a lot better for me. ;-) And riding them regularly does them (and me) a lot of good.
I think they call that an Oxymoron!...so I can get reliable shop support!
You don't think it's possible? I have a almost flawless Mazda car shop that takes care of the little details. Why not a motorcycle shop?I think they call that an Oxymoron!
Maybe you should switch to ST1100s ....Very true!
But, I have the 2010 on the operating table right now. I'm getting close to getting it back on the road. But then I have to tear into the '04#2 and get it ready to be sold. Then I have to tear into the 2012 and install the FARKLEs on it that I remove from the '04#2. Once I get the '04#2 sold, I'll start on the '04#1. I need to replace the waterpump and the rear seals. And then sell it!
It would cost me way too much to pay a shop to do all that! Once I get back down to just two bikes (the 2012 & 2010), then I hope not to be banging my knuckles as much! :