Erdoc48
Site Supporter
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Messages
- 1,443
- Age
- 61
- Location
- Myrtle Beach, SC/ Sometimes Colorado
- Bike
- 94/00/04 STs, FSC600
I was able to source a used Superbrace for the 1100 - thank you michael g (already have one on the 2000)- the one I just received is an earlier version of the one I have on the 2000. On the 94, I have the fork tube height about 2-3 mm above the top of the upper triple clamp (see pic):

And have roughly the same setup on the 2000. The issue is that I can’t get the Superbrace to fit on the 94 (which is an ABS1 bike) and I can move a line out of the way to allow the brace to fit if I raise the fork tube up ~ 2 cm from where it is now (I have Progressive springs put in by the prior owner and the 2000 has the OEM springs if that makes a difference). So on the 94, the rake would change just a bit (and in the service manual, there is no mention of how many mm above the upper triple clamp the fork tubes should be set at). If I measure from the lateral top of the front fender where the fork tube lower is to the junction of the tube and lower, it is just about 3/4” difference (so 2.5” on the 2000 and 1.75” on the 94).
What I did today was install the earlier version on the 2000 (very tightly on there so no worries) and I was going to use the newer one on the 94. In the old days when Superbrace made them for the ST1100, it indicated it would not fit the ABS bikes because the fenders were different (on the ABS2 bikes)- but on the bikes I have, the fenders are the same.
So here is the question: Does the change in rake matter all that much as we’re talking about just raising the fork tube just a bit to allow installation of the brace? Thanks as always for any replies.
Here it is on the 2000:

^^ That’s not paint damage, that’s sweat on my fender since it was so dang hot in the garage despite the AC and fan on in the garage.
Also, new version requires removal of the plastic fork protectors, prior version requires them in place as a clamping surface/ spacer, so I placed them carefully (were cut previously) and clamped the old brace in place.


And have roughly the same setup on the 2000. The issue is that I can’t get the Superbrace to fit on the 94 (which is an ABS1 bike) and I can move a line out of the way to allow the brace to fit if I raise the fork tube up ~ 2 cm from where it is now (I have Progressive springs put in by the prior owner and the 2000 has the OEM springs if that makes a difference). So on the 94, the rake would change just a bit (and in the service manual, there is no mention of how many mm above the upper triple clamp the fork tubes should be set at). If I measure from the lateral top of the front fender where the fork tube lower is to the junction of the tube and lower, it is just about 3/4” difference (so 2.5” on the 2000 and 1.75” on the 94).
What I did today was install the earlier version on the 2000 (very tightly on there so no worries) and I was going to use the newer one on the 94. In the old days when Superbrace made them for the ST1100, it indicated it would not fit the ABS bikes because the fenders were different (on the ABS2 bikes)- but on the bikes I have, the fenders are the same.
So here is the question: Does the change in rake matter all that much as we’re talking about just raising the fork tube just a bit to allow installation of the brace? Thanks as always for any replies.
Here it is on the 2000:

^^ That’s not paint damage, that’s sweat on my fender since it was so dang hot in the garage despite the AC and fan on in the garage.
Also, new version requires removal of the plastic fork protectors, prior version requires them in place as a clamping surface/ spacer, so I placed them carefully (were cut previously) and clamped the old brace in place.

Last edited: