my two cents before I do some research and get it right, but if I seem to recollect correctly on the operation of the basic CV is that it's more of a mass flow rate type of mechanism; thinner air has less mass and results in lower CV thingamabob aperture [I like that word, if no one says anything... it's gonna get used more] position and being connected directly to the whwowhwo [tappered rod in the main jet.. it's been a while, and a few brain cells] it tends to compensate for air density and maintain a fairly constant air / fuel ratio. Anyways, something along those lines, I know they don't use too many Rochester Quadrajets on them. I did look a bit on the specific differences and all going on with the CVs but I guess it's going the way of the doo doo, I've got a twin CVd with only 3k, at sea level here it's I wonder if I ever drove it in Calgary for example [3,450] if I might want to change the jetting; also maybe getting a bit off but I noticed during my time of advancing the odometer on said carbed machine from the 3 to 5k kilometer mark I think I'm solely responsible for the slight bluing of the pipe inlets, wondering if my using the 94 affects that. But a good link to the CV explained would be relative to this discussion, will post if I find.