STripper
Brian
That looks comfy. Where do the other parts of the three-point seat belt attach?
That looks comfy. Where do the other parts of the three-point seat belt attach?![]()
I put 70,000 miles on a Sargeant. I'd give it an 8 out if 10...
Picking up a new ST in a few weeks that has a Russell on it so I'll be able to compare.
Asking what is the most comfortable seat is like asking what is the most beautiful woman. What works for me may not work for you. Look in these seat threads and you will find every aftermarket seat has it's fans and in the classifieds you will find examples of all of them for sale because they weren't the silver bullet for butt pain.
Do you know the details of the person this seat was built for? Please let me know if you decide to sell it and the details of the original build specs.
Re: seats
Originally Posted by Ron
A Corbin is good for an hour.
posted by jimbeauxk
That's nonsense. I've only had Corbins on my bikes, so I can't comment on the others (and won't). I'm sure they are all fine seats, but unless you've owned them all, there's really no sense throwing opinions out there. My only con with a Corbin is they sit lower, and I'm a taller guy, so I lose some real estate between the seat and the footpegs.
Have a 3k trip coming up next week, with some 500-700 mile days. Will see how my opinion of the stock seat holds up.
Well, I am back from my trip from KC to Vegas and back. Lots of 500-700 mile days, including one 776 mile day. My opinion on the stock seat is still good. It didn't bother me until the point where everything is bothering you (helmet, ear plugs, back, legs, wrists, etc.), and you know you are ready to call it a day. But, seriously, I thought the seat was fine. Not enough to make me want to go drop $500+ on a new seat. But, I know this varies from person to person. If I had $500 burning a hole in my pocket, I might be tempted to purchase an aftermarket seat. But for now, I am OK with stock.
height, width, mass?My opinion on the stock seat is still good.
I am assuming you mean 5'10", 192 lbs., not sure what you mean by width? I have a 36" waist.height, width, mass?
Actually, Kevin, that suggests that you need to fix your helmet, ear plugs and riding position ... as well as the seat
Imagine you are contemplating multiple 1000+ mile days. Even a perfect seat is not going to help if your other stuff is only good for 700 miles.
The key to LD Riding is to identify EVERY annoyance and distraction, and ruthlessly eliminate them.
I respect your opinion Ben, but for me a Corbin that had 56K on it worked fine. I think it has more to do with if your butt will like the hard seat or not. Mine did.
I hope my budget and my time will someday allow me to do multiple 1000+ mile days. But, you don't have to be an Iron Butt devotee to enjoy motorcycling. I'll take what I can get and thank God for it.
There is a difference in the styles that nobody has talked about, and it is THE main difference. When discussing motorcycle seats, you have to distinguish between SEAT mfgs and SADDLE mfgs. Comparisons of seats vs. saddles is a waste of time. They aren't the same thing, so you'll get WIDELY varying responses and opinions.
This is what matters:
Corbin makes SADDLES.
Sargent and RDL's are SEATS.
Some butts like SADDLES. Some like SEATS. KNOW which style your butt likes, then get opinions on THAT style . LOL!! Comparing a Corbin to a Russell is fruitless.