It seems to me manufacturers (other than Honda) are trying to make their profits by taking an ever-shrinking pool of experienced motorcyclists and trying to convince them to buy newer bikes and more expensive bikes,
rather than the bike makers promoting the idea of expanding the market to get new people interested in riding for the first time.
You could well be right, I've just about quit trying to figure this all out.
You and I are just different from most men, even most men "our age." As a rider, I was different from the get-go, back in high school, choosing a motor with only two wheels instead of four.
Maybe I'm a "rebel without a clue", but no matter -- I've long ago run out of damns to give, over what most people think of me.
What i do know is, if I were 30 or younger, I would not have been able to afford the price of a new ST1300 back in the day. That's why I didn't ever get one at the time. I certainly wouldn't have had the cash to buy a nearly- new BMW adventure bike.
I can't even imagine paying for decent insurance at a younger age today, so the many birthdays in my past does have at least that one advantage.
And what i do see also, as noted above, is fewer younger folk riding around on pedal bikes, much less being excited about driving. While it's true I can't completely relate to staying indoors most of the time looking at phones, computers or tv's, I try not to judge.
In the End, there has nearly always been some degree of conflict between one generation to the next.
In my case, it was music. I think my parents had that issue with my grandparents, too.
And these days, the tech seems to exacerbate the distance between the age groups.
But again, I ride for me and what it does for me, more than whatever statement that may or may not make about me.
I also agree that, for the most part, manufacturers are not working overly hard to entice young Americans to ride their products, and it's kind of a shame.