Goldwing vs ST1100, cudo's to the ST

Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
238
Location
New Port Richey, Fl.
Bike
'93 ST1100
After 12 years of riding a '93 ST1100 around the eastern US, bought a great condition 2000 GL1500se to take its place.
Being able to easily stop flat footed and older age on flat Florida roads steered me to the Wing for rest of life riding instead of a trike.

Now that I've had the Wing for a couple months, what was Honda thinking?

I do like the Wing and will keep it, but it seems every time I do something, the ST does it better. If you are considering a change to a Wing, just some things to think about. Now, my ST is setup more like a Wing, with Russel seat and ST1300 top box, so not everyone with an ST will notice these ST/Wing differences.

Wing con's:

Storage. You mean the Wing doesn't hold more than a ST?
I can't even put my cell phone in either front pocket. Left pannier is not large enough to hold my helmet unless I remove tool kit. Tank bags seem like a "what's that" with the Wing, and tough to find. With vent in windscreen, no room above dash for storage. 160lb Wife would use my ST backrest pouch to hold snakes when we ride, but on the Wing I had to actually remove the backrest so she would have enough room to be comfortable back there, so no easy snack access. The rear cubbies on the Wing do not allow her easy access, and they seem to easily break, so trying to avoid using them. ST no problem for any of this. On a side note, both wife and myself agree the Russel ST seat is more comfortable than the Wings sofa.

Power.
Due to size and weight, I expected the newer flat 6 cylinder 1500 Wing to be a little less powerful than the old V4 1100, but not this bad. The ST takes off more like a crotch rocket, while the Wing feels slower than my Honda Civic. Even at highway speeds, downshift the ST and it takes off, while the Wing goes more like a car.

Economy and range.
300 mile trips from Tampa to Ft Lauderdale were nothing on the ST. The Wing, with its smaller gas tank and worse mpg, means 200 miles is about all we can go on a tank.

Brakes.
ST stops short and fast. Wing stops like a large truck, scary at times. Almost no play in front brake lever of the ST, while the Wing almost feels like you have another clutch lever to pull (slightly exaggerating of course)

Ease of maintenance.
Wing does not have a key you turn to remove saddlebags, topbox or seat. All that stuff needs to have tools to remove. Plastic needs removed for almost everything, and there is a lot of plastic. Photo below shows stuff I removed to change filters on the Wing. I hear the rear tire change is a couple hours work, just to get it off.

Other stuff.
The HUGE old school radio/cb does not lend itself to easy upgrades. We use bluetooth headsets with FM music, plus full access to mp3's and anything phone related, all changed by talking into headset, hands-free. Wing radio controls on left grip are ugly and get in the way of mounting additional farkles. The two huge Wing antennas are as useful as a trunk CD changer in a car.

Forums:
Wing forums try, but the info out there for the ST is far more advanced and easy to find. I still haven't found saddle bag liners custom fit just for the Wing, while I was able to get them instantly for the ST, and at a low cost. We'll end up using the ST liners in the Wing.

------------------------------------------------------------
Now, stuff I like about the wing:

It is quieter.

Being able to sit flat footed when stopped and not wearing riding boots. The ST when stopped feels like it is a couple hundred pounds heavier than the Wing. But when moving, the ST feels much lighter than the wing.

Other non-Honda riders actually wave now. The Wing being Black with a lot of chrome might help as it could be confused with other american motorcycles. Harley riders are a LOT more friendly now. The Wing seems to fit in better with society.

Wing Cruise control is much better than ST's throttle lock.

Wings has ton's of wind protection, but also a lot of vents. I can ride at any speed with visor up. Riding the ST with tall windscreen and visor would slam down anytime I went above 30mph. Wife and I can actually talk at speed without using headset. In Florida the foot warmers are useless, but they do work as they were stuck open and I had to modify to keep them closed.

Carb rebuilding was much easier on a flat 6 with 2 carbs than a V4 with 4 carbs.

Forgot to mention:
Reverse. This is sweet. I am able to ride the Wing around tight obstacles like pathways and a car to get in and out of backyard shed, all thanks to reverse.

------------------------------

The photo below shows what needs to be removed to change filters on the Wing


.simple filters and speaker change.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wow, looks like a Tupperware party! Nice write-up. Wonder how the GL1800 and the new GW stack up when compared in a similar fashion? I think as I get older, I'm going to trend toward less weight and less plastic to ease the burden of maintenance. Although that new GW sure is nice. ;)
 
The new Wing is nice but the air filter is located where disassembly of the bike is required. I am enjoying the new wing but when it is time to change the air filter I may have to trade it off. Not really but it is not user friendly.
A guy named Fred Harmon sells a video "How To" for most remove/install all the pieces. Well worth the money if you do your own maintenance and I do.

I know OP has an ST1100 but comparing the ST1300 to the new Wing, the ST, especially with Hondaline topbox or other, has a greater luggage capacity than the Wing. The Wing has a mileage of 220/230 before needing gas. ST supertanker much better as we all know. Wing runs on regular, ST premium (supposedly). Wing has much more electrowizardry if that's your thing.

When I sold my ST it had the racetech suspension upgrade (well worth the money!) and a McCruise installed. Two pricey items but still thousands less than a new Wing. Those two upgrades will give you an ST that can run with anything on the road today and for lots less cash.
 
I have a 97 st1100abs and a 07 wing....enjoy them booth.
 
I have a friend with a F6B. His bike handles as well as my ST1300. It also has as much if not more power than my ST.
 
I did a double take - why would your wife need snakes on a ride...? Typo that you might NOT correct. Makes for more interesting reading.
 
I did a double take - why would your wife need snakes on a ride...? Typo that you might NOT correct. Makes for more interesting reading.

"....Wife would use my ST backrest pouch to hold snakes when we ride ...."
LOL, she would kill me if she saw that typo as those are her greatest fear. But for this thread, we'll leave it in there. :)
 
With the brake issue, is it possible it just needs to be bled, and maybe there’s a little air in the brake line? I would think it should stop more quickly. The GW you have is now 2 generations behind, so I would assume it’ll handle a little less well than the ST1100
 
With the brake issue, is it possible it just needs to be bled, and maybe there’s a little air in the brake line? I would think it should stop more quickly. The GW you have is now 2 generations behind, so I would assume it’ll handle a little less well than the ST1100

Brakes have been bled.

The ST has an adjustment for front brake lever free play, I set it tight, and works both front calipers when pulled.

One issue with the brake difference I think is because the Wing uses linked front/rear brakes. Front brake lever only activates one of the front calipers. The other front caliper is activated when using the rear brake. I've been using front brake for majority of braking power since beginning of time, so hard to get used to having to apply a bunch of front and a bunch of rear brake to stop fast.
 
Last edited:
One thing I always liked about the Goldwings were the smooth flat 6 cylinder engines. They seemed a little smoother than our V4 engines. The new Goldwings in sport mode sure seems faster than our ST's.
 
The new Wing is nice but the air filter is located where disassembly of the bike is required.
I have never seen the set up but I was told that it is something like a 4 or 5 hour job to replace an air filter.
Is that true?
 
Last edited:
I've changed air filters on ST1300 GL1800. labor time decreases as you do the change more. I can do my Wing in 45-60 minutes start to finish. It was longer on the ST.
 
One issue with the brake difference I think is because the Wing uses linked front/rear brakes. Front brake lever only activates one of the front calibers. The other front caliber is activated when using the rear brake.
Are you sure about that? I thought that was true with early 'Wings and would have thought the 2000-ish 'Wings would be more like the ST1300s with more but not all pistons activated in both front calipers (and one/some of the rear brake). That's a lot of bike to stop with only one caliper.
 
Are you sure about that? I thought that was true with early 'Wings and would have thought the 2000-ish 'Wings would be more like the ST1300s with more but not all pistons activated in both front calipers (and one/some of the rear brake). That's a lot of bike to stop with only one caliper.

Yes it is only one caliper. 2000 was the last year they made the GL1500, then they switched to the GL1800's.
 
I haven't done that yet but I am guessing by looking at the Fred Harmon videos that is close to correct. Lots of plastic has to come off. I installed fog lights on mine and most of the top of the bike had to come off to get the fog light switch on the control panel. Still had pieces to go to get to the air filter. I'm pretty slow at this stuff and the first time you do any of it takes longer. If you did two or three a week I'm sure you could be faster.
There are a lot of plastic clips and pins to lose if not careful. Screws not readily visible. The plastic panels have several alignment tabs that must be reinstalled correctly when reinstalling. It sounds intimidating but it really isn't. As long as you have a good guide to go by and some patience then you should be good to go. Just takes time.

Or you can pay the dealer and if they don't do Wings very often you can count on some of those pins missing and tabs broken.
 
Comparing a 2 generation old 20 year old Wing to a previous generation 27 year old ST makes perfect sense. They were at least contemporaries of a sort.

Can you buy your ST back or get another one?
 
I have owned a 1991 ST100, two 2004 ST1300's, a 2009 GL1800, 2016 R1200RT BMW and now the 2018 GL1800 DCT Tour. The 2018 is by far the best bike I have ever owned.
I would have never even considered owning a GL1500. They were not a very good bike - IMO.
 
Nice write up. I enjoyed it. I have never ridden a 1500, but a guy in my local GWRRA group has one and loves it.

I went from an ST1100 ABSII to an 08 Wing. Like dduelin said, the GL1500 is same generation as the ST1100, and the GL1800 is next generation, more akin to the ST1300. The brakes on my ST1100 (ABS2) were better than the WIng, the ST was faster, and I liked the STs traction control that the Wing doesn't have. I think the Wing is easier to ride because of the ease of "tip in". The seat on the Wing is much lower than my lowered ST. I had to add Helibars and a Madstad windshield, but so far the stock seat seems OK. I cancelled my Russell build date. I love the cruise, and the reverse is far more useful than you would think. I've got 3 years and 4 months before I can test ride an 18!

The ST forum is better than any Wing forum I've seen.
 
I think the Wing is easier to ride because of the ease of "tip in".
By that, do you mean the ST doesn't respond as well to steering input, seems to resist leaning a bit, and requires greater counter-steering pressure than is instinctive?

If so, that was my experience when I first got mine, until I raised the rear suspension some to compensate for my greater weight than Robbie, from whom I bought it.

It's much more responsive now, leans and comes back up much more easily. I raised the rings on the shock about a half inch, which probably translates to 3/4" at the axle.
 
Back
Top Bottom