Its been pumping through the oil passages of my bike for some 21 years so yep I gonna keep using it.I gave up on oil threads long ago. Just go to Honda dealer, buy GN4, pour into bike, forget the rest. It's not that hard.
Its been pumping through the oil passages of my bike for some 21 years so yep I gonna keep using it.I gave up on oil threads long ago. Just go to Honda dealer, buy GN4, pour into bike, forget the rest. It's not that hard.
Nothing wrong with it, and your ST will run forever on just about anything, it’s just that there are better oils out there as verified by UOA’s, that don’t have the price market up.Its been pumping through the oil passages of my bike for some 21 years so yep I gonna keep using it.
Honda has a cute little square saying some to the effect of this oil meets OUR standards, which may or may not meet the API standards etc.
they are doing the SHELL thing by implying it meets the standards, but it was not tested so they can’t use the American patroleum institute donut,
I called valvoline to ask them about their premium blue one solution (not JASO rated) and has not been tested nor certified, however they also assured me that there were no additives in this oil that would hurt a wet clutch etc.
The point here is that Shell's or Valvolene's labels no longer state the oil meets or exceeds API ratings for gasoline engine use. They have dropped the reference to spark engine use completely. It's true. You can argue it doesn't matter all you want and not change that fact.The first two comments express a distinct lack of confidence in the claims made by Honda and Shell that their oils meet the standards that they are claiming to meet, specifically because they do not have the appropriate certifications to support the claims that they are making.
I support this position. If they wish to make claim to standards that exist, support that claim with a valid certification. Without the certification, it is just marketing.
The third comment appears to offer acceptance that the Valvoline oil meets a standard that it is not certified for either. This acceptance is because of a phone call where this claim was repeated by Valvoline, not because Valvoline offered proof of the appropriate certification. This seems no different than the Honda and Shell claims above.
If the lack of trust in the claims made by Honda and Shell are justified because they do not have the appropriate certifications to support their claims, it follows that the same lack of trust should extend to claims made by Valvoline as well when they also lack the appropriate certification to support their claim.
This seems contradictory.
I don't see the difference between the unsupported claims made by Valvoline and the unsupported claims made by Honda and Shell, or any of the other producers for that matter.
You started itOil Threads…
How is this still going?
You started it.
Upt'North.
Yep oil is a funny thing indeed. My old 2005 Corolla has 228,579 miles on it all with Pennzoil yellow bottle non synthetic oil. And you are correct there are better oils out there as in full synthetic. But my thing is why change something that has been working all these miles. Even the lowly GN4 has fulfilled it's purpose. Yep I grant you there are better motorcycle oils out there but here again my vehicles just love the oil's i'm putting in them. Then consider this I don't have any evidence just a hunch but I bet some of those 500K mile Goldwing engines got that mileage out of dealer supplied Honda GN4 oilsNothing wrong with it, and your ST will run forever on just about anything, it’s just that there are better oils out there as verified by UOA’s, that don’t have the price market up.
Do you need better? Probably not.
I’ve had more than a few bikes with over 300,000 miles on them running diesel oil, and as some will point out, they don’t meet any of Honda’s requirements and shouldn’t be used.![]()
I understood your point Dave, you may have missed mine. I agree that the standards that are called for and the certifications that confirm that they are being met are my only means of verifying oil compatibility, which is why I use them. I have often responded to these threads by advising a requestor of what the standards are that need to be met according to Honda. I did not state what I consider is a good oil for others to use, their bike, their choice. I also agree that people can ignore the manufacturer's recommendations and the certification protocols that are in place and use what they like, its their bike, their choice. As an example, I have often stated that the lack of the energy/resource conserving statement on a label no longer means anything. The labeling standards have changed. The oil can be full of the friction modifiers that are harmful to a wet clutch. The only verifiable guarantee of wet clutch compatibility now is the JASO MA certification. That does not mean that there are not other oils that are safe for wet clutch use. There most certainly are. What it does mean is that the only way for a consumer to verify which oils have been tested and confirmed to be wet clutch safe is by the JASO MA certification.My contribution to these threads is not really "what's a good oil for the ST?" People are free to use whatever oil they prefer but one cannot state a particular oil meets Honda's recommendations when it doesn't. Everyone is free to believe that those recommendations in owners and service manuals don't matter and use the oil they want to use.
In your own words Dave…..it’s in English on the front of the bottle. And on the back, Gasoline engines.The point here is that Shell's or Valvolene's labels no longer state the oil meets or exceeds API ratings for gasoline engine use. They have dropped the reference to spark engine use completely. It's true. You can argue it doesn't matter all you want and not change that fact.
Honda doesn't sell diesels and doesn't have to market oils that are now stripped of the high parts per million of zinc and phosphate that diesel oils prior to the latest API CK-4 used to contain. That's fact and you can argue all you want that it doesn't matter but it doesn't change that fact.
My contribution to these threads is not really "what's a good oil for the ST?" People are free to use whatever oil they prefer but one cannot state a particular oil meets Honda's recommendations when it doesn't. Everyone is free to believe that those recommendations in owners and service manuals don't matter and use the oil they want to use.
Finally, real science!
That's funny to me. I remember thinking that Shell gasoline made my '96 Nighthawk's exhaust smell strange.It’s not that I don’t trust she’ll, I just personally don’t like the smell of it . . .
Top secret lab
I’ll have to get a white lab coat and do a YouTube video, I guess that makes it official and believable.
What we need is a fort nine oil video.never, even on other boards, have I seen folks trying so hard to let others do as they please while simultaneously letting them know that any way except their own is wrong. Oil, a slippery slope of a topic…
I like this video because it mocks the oil thing so well.