RobbieAG
Robert
I think a closer BMW comparison to a Goldwing would be the K1600GT/GTL. I would go with that over a Goldwing. If I had to choose between the RT and Goldwing, I'd probably go Goldwing.
I think it depends on model. The F series have a far better track record than the R series. I would have more confidence in finding a competent mechanic at a random BMW shop than at a random Honda shop. I think it more likely that I'd end up at a random BMW shop.I think most of the "reliability" issues are more hearsay anymore than fact. Of course mine might fall apart tomorrow...
I'd agree with you on the older BMWs though.
Chris
I totally agree with you on that. When I think of BMW failures, I think of the final drive on the older shaft driven R models. My F800GT had a belt drive. The F900XR has a chain drive. Pretty simple design. Both F models.I think it depends on model. The F series have a far better track record than the R series. I would have more confidence in finding a competent mechanic at a random BMW shop than at a random Honda shop. I think it more likely that I'd end up at a random BMW shop.
As a former wing owner, I have to say this is patently untrue. We shop at Super Target.In my age denial my "post"-70 year old self would definitely go for the RT...
If you buy the GW, you'll need the appropriate costume to go with it. Boat shoes with shorts and a nice knit shirt for your trips to Walmart.
Chris
Apparently you need to find smarter friends who ride red.Not to throw any mud, but I have a friend who swears by beemers, they spent more time in the shop for little things in its first year than my ST did in its first 5 years. They have their problems too. Just like most motor vehicles. It is handled quietly. He is buying Triumphs now, and dang- they have been in the shop too.
He did buy a KTM once, it was in the shop most of its first year. Waiting for parts to arrive.

I think what you’re saying is true across the industry. There’s just seems to be a universal malaise and loss of enthusiasm. The lack of really new and interesting machines hasn’t helped.I've owned both as old models and still like every model of both ever made. I'd pick any RT over any Goldwing of the same value.
For me, Goldwinging is kinda dead and that bothers me. I belonged to a Goldwing club back in the heydays. Goldwings were very popular and high profile bikes. Rides, meetings, buzz, online and on-road. It was fun and I'd happily return to all that if it still existed. Now there are no clubs, no buzz, and I don't see Goldwings out in the wild nearly as much as in the past, or as much as I would expect. The new model didn't do much to revive the brand.
The world is sadly way past peak Goldwing as it is way past peak Sporttouring.
RT's are doing better than Goldwings. BMW won the Sporttouring wars by horrifying attrition and is the only Sporttouring Brand that is still alive by my observations. That counts for something with me. So, if you are ok with the expenses associated with that brand, and that the hugest of if's, then RT.
Best wishes with your decision.
(Disclaimer: For me, ADV bikes are not sporttouring. Excellent as they are they are something else to me, so I exclude those bikes.)
Actually the older (by that I mean airheads) were, I believe, more reliable than the newer ones. I’ve ridden with a number of BMW owners and have heard stories of woe that I’ve never heard from the Japanese bike owners. To the BMW owners’ credit they seem to take it in stride as an expected normal thing, price of admission kinda thing I guess.I think most of the "reliability" issues are more hearsay anymore than fact. Of course mine might fall apart tomorrow...
I'd agree with you on the older BMWs though.
Chris