Stock ST1300 Horsepower

Can any of our brothers across the pond confirm the engine size on the Pan? Bikez says its 996cc? And that it makes more HP and torque. Are these stats calculated differently over there?

Dunno where they got those '06 numbers, but the displacement for all years is 1261cc.

--Mark
 
Dunno where they got those '06 numbers, but the displacement for all years is 1261cc.

--Mark

I know the ST here in the states is 1261cc, just wanted to confirm the size of the Pan. I thought maybe they had a CC restriction in the UK/Europe.

Maybe thats the difference between the European "Pan Euro" VS the North American ST1300.
 
Just remember that we buy HP and drive torque.
As was mentioned the STs have great torque...

Mark
 
Ray, are you saying the OEM pipes weigh that much more! WOW

The Staintunes still need to be pivoted out of the way for axle removal.

The Staintunes weigh apx. 1/2 as much as the oem pipes. It's a decent weight savings, especially that far back.

Ray
 
It may be different for the 1300, but on my 1100, I just remove the lower mounting bolt for the rear shock, which drops everything enough to allow the axle to come out underneath my STAINTUNES.

Has anyone tried that on a 1300 yet?

Oh, and to keep this "on thread": confirm the HP @ 114.1 / Tq @ 83.5 according to "Motorcyclist" - 11/07

Ray
 
The Staintunes still need to be pivoted out of the way for axle removal.

The Staintunes weigh apx. 1/2 as much as the oem pipes. It's a decent weight savings, especially that far back.

Ray

I can remove the axle, with out moving the Staintunes. It is very close but can be done. On mine anyway. Ritch :03biker:
 
The Staintunes weigh apx. 1/2 as much as the oem pipes. It's a decent weight savings, especially that far back.

Ray


The stock pipes contain catalytic converters to meet the 2008 California rules. Bike would probably fail a smog test without the stock pipes. So the weight savings will dirty the air a bit.
 
Back
Top Bottom