Re: Replacement for the Honda ST1300 in 2014?
There are two considerations for Honda in whether or not to develop a new ST. The first is the size of the market segment. It's a flat segment with more bikes in it now than when the ST1300 was introduced. That's not an encouraging prospect for a company. ADV bikes have pretty much cannibalized the light SPORT-touring market, and made inroads into our segment.
However, the second consideration is the heavy LEO/service market. THAT is one that, if Honda really set their noggins to it, they could blow BMW & H-D out of the water. Kawasaki, IIRC, has had a rough go of it with their partnering approach. BMW & H-D get hammered for their service costs.
So, what if Honda actually set out to design an optimal heavy cop bike? The ST's engine is good, good enough to keep alive and put into the CTX1300. Improve everything about serviceability. Make a few other tweaks, including explicitly (but without acknowledging an actual problem) addressing the dreaded semi-mythical high speed weave. Bring the lifecycle cost down.
That, frankly, is the most likely route to a new ST. The question is, what is the replacement cycle like for LEO bikes? How much of their engineering resources will Honda have available, what with the next-gen Goldwing almost certainly in the works, probably a new Fireblade or 600 Supersport (but not both) in the works, and the usual farting around with cruisers going on.
Still, if you guys think about it, we really don't have much to complain about.
After all, at least we haven't been waiting as long as XR650L fans....